News

What’s in a Name? The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same.

By Brian O’Riordan, LIFE Policy Adviser 

 

What’s in a name? In the recently announced EU budget for the next period – the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the period 2028 to 2034 – fisheries funding under the EMFAF has been subsumed into the National and Regional Partnership Fund (NRPF) worth an eyewatering Euros 865 billion. Within the NRPF, 2 billion Euros has been “ringfenced (as a minimum) for fisheries”, says Commission President, von der Leyen. In addition to the 2 billion, fisheries interests will be able to apply for sectoral support (including for modernisation, decarbonisation, fleet renewal, fish marketing, fisheries regeneration) under the NRPF. 

The more things change, the more they remain the same, and it is still far from clear how this huge readjustment could help small-scale fisheries (SSF). In this piece, we take a preliminary look at these new arrangements, and what needs to be done for them to make the difference needed to bring SSF back from the brink, and to support the sector into the future so that it can realise its full potential in the fight to restore Europe’s declining seas.

As for the Common Fisheries Policy, so for the funding of fisheries: small-scale fisheries are a forgotten fleet, a policy outlier – and have been for the past 4 decades. Will the new policies in the pipeline – the Ocean Act and the National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPP) for sectoral support – change the status quo? Both the Ocean Pact (the precursor of the Ocean Act) and the EC proposal for sectoral support for the next period, make small-scale fisheries a priority. This is to be welcomed. 

For LIFE, bringing small-scale fisheries back to the centre of fisheries policies requires making fishing fair through a differentiated approach. Such an approach must take into account the special and different characteristics of the small-scale fleet – that set it apart socially, economically and environmentally, and which could make it a game changer for Europe’s troubled seas. To achieve this, LIFE is calling on the Commission and European decision takers to “Make Fishing Fair”. In this endeavour, sectorial support is key to making fishing fair, alongside fair access to resources and fair access to markets. 

LIFE contends that fair access to sectoral support for all fleet segments should be based on economic, social and environmental considerations (i.e. giving priority those who fish in the most sustainable way and who provide the greatest benefits to society). In a nutshell, fuel subsidies and financial support need to be shifted away from high-polluting, high impacting vessels towards initiatives that support environmentally friendly and socio-economically beneficial fishing.

We await with anticipation some clarity on how the new funding mechanisms included in the new budget for the next 7-year period, 2028-34, will work. In particular, what special mechanisms and safeguards will be included to ensure that the next EU Budget will work for small-scale fisheries, where such issues as generational renewal, fleet decarbonisation, and viability are ever more pressing?

 

The New EU Budget – the Multiannual Funding Framework (MFF): EMFAF disappears into the National and Regional Partnership Fund (NRPF)

The so-called Multiannual Funding Framework (MFF – the EU’s Budget) has been given a massive shake up by the European Commission, combining many of the existing financial mechanisms – including the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the European Agriculture Guarantee Fund, and the fund for Rural Development – into the European Economic, Territorial, Social, Rural and Maritime Sustainable Prosperity and Security Fund.  

In her Statement on July 16, Commission President von der Leyen outlined 5 key areas of the new MFF: Firstly, “investing in people, Member States and regions, National and Regional Partnership Plans (NRPPs) worth EUR 865 billion, will be the foundation for investment and reform.  At their heart remain cohesion and agriculture”. Von de Leyen stated EUR 300 billion will be safeguarded for farmers’ income support, and “on Fisheries, EUR  2 billion are ringfenced as a minimum”, she said.

For his part, Commissioner for Fisheries and Oceans, Costas Kadis stated that: “fisheries and aquaculture producers will remain the lifeblood of Europe’s coastal communities and economies.”

He went on the reassure that fisheries and ocean related policies would be well reflected in the 3 main building blocks of the new MFF – the National and Regional Partnership Fund (NRPF worth EUR 453 billion), the European Competitiveness Fund (EUR 409 billion to support investments in the Blue Economy, including fisheries), Horizon Europe (EUR 175 billion to support ocean observation, research and innovation), and Global Europe (EUR 200 billion to support Ocean Diplomacy and the fight against IUU). 

In addition to the Euros 2 billion ringfenced “for supporting the CFP”, Kadis mentioned that an EU facility worth 63 billion would be available to fund data collection, fisheries control and digital solutions. 

It may be worth reflecting that compared to the 6 billion of the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) for the previous 7 year period, 2 billion is significant belt tightening. President of the European Parliament Pech Committee, Carmen Crespo Díaz, expressed concern about the CFP losing its identity and importance, stating that “Fisheries is a common EU policy. It must not lose its identity. Without a specific fund, there is no specific policy”.  

However, Kadis did emphasise that “EU fishers and aquaculture producers can (also) have access to the big pot of EUR 453 bn, through the national plans (the NRPPs) submitted by EU Member States.” Obviously though, this depends on national and regional priorities and the demands from competing sectors. 

Further insights are provided in the proposal published by the European Commission for a regulation in support of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP), the Ocean Pact and the EU’s maritime and aquaculture policy for the next 7-year funding period

The proposal provides a long list of the areas to be covered by the NRPF for the maritime sectors referred to, namely:

“the generational renewal and energy transition of fisheries, sustainable aquaculture activities, and processing and marketing of fishery and aquaculture products, sustainable blue economy in coastal, island and inland areas, marine knowledge, skilling of blue economy related activities, the resilience of coastal communities and in particular of small-scale coastal fishing, the strengthening of international ocean governance and observation and enabling seas and ocean to be safe, secure, clean and sustainably managed”

Perhaps small-scale fishers can  take heart that, in Recital 5, the new NRPF proposal for the combined maritime sectors states that: the particular needs of small-scale coastal fishing, and the contribution to environmental, economic and social sustainability of fishing operations, as defined in the CFP Regulation 1380/2013 should be addressed in the National and Regional Partnership (NRP) Plans, as set out in Article 22 of [NRP Regulation]. Also that Article 3.3 states that “for operations related to small-scale coastal fishing, Member States may grant a maximum 100 % aid intensity rate.”

However, whatever the new instrument may be called, whatever the aid intensity rate, and whatever the nice wording used, unless the specificities of small-scale fisheries are taken into account, funding will continue to fall short. 

Three key issues, long neglected in previous EU budgets, need particular attention: a) the lack of political will to support small-scale fisheries and the squeezing of the sector on many sides; b) the complexity of the process for applying for funds, and the heavy bureaucratic burdens imposed; and c) the need for projects to be completed before funding becomes available. 

Unless these issues are addressed, and a dedicated delivery system for small-scale fisheries with clear priorities established, whatever name is given to sectoral support and whatever fine declarations are made, funds will not reach Europe’s forgotten fleet. The Blue Seeds initiative in partnership with WWF shows how pre-financing can work for delivering successful and sustainable solutions for small-scale fisheries projects. This could be one line to follow in the NRPPs for funding SSF.

Fleet Modernisation, Decarbonisation and Generational Renewal: more questions than answers

In previous EMFF and EMFAF proposals the Commission had set out conditions for fleet modernisation and renewal, with special provisions for small-scale fisheries (through National SSF Action Plans). Although generational renewal and energy transition are the first mentioned priorities of the NRPF, there is no mention of how this is to be achieved through funding of new vessels (for young fishers) or vessel conversions and retrofitting new engines and equipment (for decarbonisation). 

An optimistic interpretation of this would be that the Commission has taken simplification to its logical conclusion and placed the entire responsibility on Member States for deciding what priority fleet renewal and decarbonisation should be given (compared to say agriculture and rural development priorities), and deciding the conditions under which new MFF funding can be allocated through the NRPPs to fisheries. This would mean that the Parliament and the Council will no longer have a role to revise the proposals, but that each Member State will be free to decide on its own framework and priorities. 

A more pessimistic view would see this as a further marginalisation of fisheries, with a drastically reduced allocation of funding, in a context of spatial squeezing from more economically and politically powerful Blue Economy sectors, and with aquaculture and as yet ill defined “Blue Food” being prioritised as the future for food to be produced from the sea. 

Clarity is therefore needed on what overarching conditions will be applied at EU level, other than the need to be WTO compliant, and with any new builds, modernisation and vessel conversions  requiring that national capacity ceilings are respected. 

All this needs to be placed in the context of a system for measuring and reporting fleet capacity that is not fit for purpose, rife with misreporting and engine certification fraud, with significant undocumented overcapacity exacerbating overfishing. The current system based on GT and kW is long overdue for reform.

We need a new fit-for-purpose system that can differentiate between fishing capacity that causes overfishing, and capacity that is needed to provide decent working conditions. Such a system also needs to enable the EU vessel fleet to modernise and to incorporate technical solutions for decarbonisation without penalties. 

The New European Finding Landscape under the MFF 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Any Questions?

The EC has just published a “Q&A” on the new 2028-2034 budget proposal for fisheries, aquaculture and ocean-related activities.

It explains that the goal of the redesign of the MFF for fisheries, aquaculture, maritime and ocean related policies is to reduce fragmentation, better align funding with national and regional priorities, and enable faster budget reallocation in response to crises and exceptional events. At the same time, the proposal aims to grant more flexibility to Member States to better address their needs and priorities.

It highlights that the NRPF can be used to make investments in rural and coastal areas, community-led local development (CLLD), smart specialisation strategies, and support for generational renewal in the fishery and aquaculture sector.

It explains that NRPPs can allocate resources to energy transition measures, and clarifies that: the Competitiveness Fund is explicitly designed to back decarbonisation and innovation – for example modernising vessels, port electrification, green shipbuilding, and blue tech.

It highlights that any fleet support must comply with WTO fisheries subsidies rules and CFP objectives.

 What makes small scale fisheries a potential game changer? 

• High socio-economic significance:70% of the EU fleet by number, 50% of the seagoing jobs, 19% by value of all EU catches; providing high quality, catch of the day fresh fish; representing an invaluable repository of local traditional and experiential knowledge of marine ecosystems, oceanography and meteorology; 
• Low environmental impact: 5% of EU catches by volume, 10% of the fishing capacity, measured by GT.
• Low carbon food production, low carbon livelihood generation; declining use of fossil fuels, 35 litres per day/ 38 Euros per day; fossil fuel consumption of SSF a drop in the ocean compared to other sectors (like maritime transport).

What are the specificities of small-scale fisheries that require a differentiated approach?

• Small-scale fishing is a traditional way of life for many coastal dwellers, who are willing to sacrifice economic gain in order to live and work next to and on the sea, and to practice the profession of their forebears. Such activity may be part-time, seasonal and combined with other activities, providing enough income to get by on.   
• SSF is based on micro or nano family based enterprises, the majority with business turnovers of 100.000 Euros or less, many engaged in seasonal or part-time employment, often reliant on unpaid or underpaid labour to make businesses viable, and with little capacity to absorb economic shocks;
• Small scale operations, with single operator or small crew on board, long hours, incurring significant opportunity costs by taking time out to attend external meetings, and with little surplus to invest in hiring representatives to act on the fishers’ behalf;
• Important source of revenue and socio-economic benefits in remote communities with few alternatives, with important links to tourism. A vibrant harbour full of small boats is an invaluable attraction for tourism, without which tourism would decline. 
• Low volume, high value production, making producers highly vulnerable to market fluctuations and competition from high volume production and low cost imported products; and
• Limited geographical range and limited fishing opportunities makes the fishing activities especially vulnerable to overfishing and competition from larger scale fishing, climate change impacts, to invasive species (like marine algae) and to displacement from traditional fishing grounds through spatial squeezing.

Vacancy notice

 

Administrative and Financial Officer

 

The Low Impact Fishers of Europe (LIFE) is a pan-European platform uniting small-scale fishers (SSF) to achieve fair fisheries, healthy seas and vibrant communities. As an organisation of organisations from across Europe, LIFE strives to provide a dedicated voice for its members, supporting them to organise regionally, and building their capacity at national and local level both as small producers and as agents of change. LIFE is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit association (asbl).

LIFE is seeking administrative and bookkeeping support to build its bookkeeping and financial reporting capacity, and to organise the administrative tasks of its Brussels Office and regional coordination.  

The need has arisen due to LIFE’s increasing role in EU-level projects, with increasing requirements to coordinate a widening diversity of activities and to provide detailed financial and administrative reports in a timely fashion following strict guidelines. Over the coming period, the number of projects we engage in is likely to increase, with the requirement for administrative and financial support becoming increasingly important. 

The post could be filled either by an outside agency providing the requisite services, or through the recruitment of an Administrative and Financial Officer as part of LIFE’s Brussels Office Team. We would like to explore both options.

Working environment and scope of work

LIFE Brussels Office is responsible for maintaining relations with the European institutions (Commission, Parliament etc), with LIFE’s members (associations of small-scale fishers), for coordinating activities, for project administration, bookkeeping and accounting, and for maintaining records. LIFE must comply with Belgian legislation governing not for profit associations (asbls), with the annual submission of financial and other reports to the Belgian authorities. 

Since the Covid pandemic, LIFE has adopted a flexible approach to homeworking/ teletravail. Our headquarters is registered at an address in Brussels where we have co-working arrangements, as well as access to meeting rooms and other facilities as and when required. 

The Administrative and Financial Officer/ external agency will work as part of a team helping to ensure the smooth running of LIFE’s activities. In particular he/she/they will provide administrative support to LIFE’s on-going work and to several new projects in which LIFE will be increasingly engaged in the coming period.

Fluency in English and French is essential; competence in other European languages is an asset.

An important part of the job will be to develop an efficient but simple system of bookkeeping and to monitor income and expenditure effectively against budgets. A good working knowledge of bookkeeping systems in general is essential. Familiarity with EU funded projects (Horizon, Interreg, EMFAF etc.) and the Belgian financial reporting requirements (Moniteur Belge/ MinFin) will be a distinct advantage. 

Diversity information: LIFE is a relatively small organization, run by fishers for fishers. The small team of male and female staff includes LIFE’s two Brussels based staff (Policy Adviser and Senior Communications Officer), Baltic and North Sea Coordinator based in Sweden and Executive Secretary based in Barcelona.

Staff recruitment is based on experience, motivation, qualifications and proven ability. 

LIFE does not discriminate by age, gender, race, religion, sexuality or socio-economic class.   

More information about LIFE can be found on our website www.lifeplatform.eu .

 

MAIN AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY

The post holder reports to the Executive Secretary, with the main areas of responsibility outlined below

Administration/Secretarial

(a) Develop a system/s to process orders and invoices, organise the payroll, maintain records of expenditure and monitor income and expenditure against budgets

(b) Maintain and develop LIFE’s bookkeeping, accounting and financial reporting systems to meet requirements of a multiplicity of donor/ project requirements 

(c) Select appropriate accounting software packages, e.g. WinBooks, Odoo, etc., to monitor income and expenditure and to generate financial reports and a management dashboard

(d) Generate project reports as required according to specific deadlines of donors and grant bodies.

(e) Generate annual financial reports in line with the requirements of Belgium law (reporting to MinFin/ Moniteur Belge) from 2025. 

(f) Support for daily administration, travel logistics, and event organisation

 

PERSON SPECIFICATION

Listed below are the requirements needed to undertake this job. Selection of candidates will be based on the extent to which these requirements are met.

Administration/Secretarial/Accounts/Financials

∙ Proven experience in a related role

∙ Experience of working with minimal supervision 

∙ Experience of and familiarity with Microsoft Office software (Word, Excel, Outlook, Powerpoint, etc) packages, bookkeeping software (Winbooks, Odoo etc), and video conferencing systems (Zoom, Teams etc)

∙ Experience of administering meetings, including minute taking

∙ Experience of the administrative and reporting needs of EU projects (Horizon, Interreg, EMFAF etc.)

∙ Experience/ knowledge of Belgian official account coding and bookkeeping requirements (Moniteur Belge/ MinFin)

∙ Experience of working with a similar organisation

Communication

∙ A high standard of written and oral communication skills

∙ Fluency in English and French (both written and oral)

∙ Fluency/ competence (written and oral) in other EU languages an asset

Personal Qualities

∙ A high degree of motivation and professionalism

∙ Excellent interpersonal and team working skills

∙ Respect for confidentiality at all times

∙ Attention to detail, especially when it comes to the bookkeeping tasks

∙ Ability to develop effective working relationships at all levels, and to take on leadership roles

∙ Ability to work unsupervised and with a high level of initiative

∙ Proactive, creative and flexible in finding solutions to problems

∙ Ability to remain calm and deliver to tight deadlines under pressure

∙ Absorb information and learn new skills quickly

 Flexibility and reliability

∙ Willingness to work unsocial hours occasionally if required

∙ Willingness to travel within Europe if required

 

PAY AND CONDITIONS

Based in Brussels, eligible to work under Belgian law and immediately available. 

Salary package commensurate with qualifications, skills and experience:

Around Euros 2.500/ month (including holiday pay; allowances for: travel; meal vouchers; GSM + abonnement; use of laptop computer).

Remuneration to outside contractor according to services provided. 

We offer flexible work options, allowing you to work from home or the office as best suits you.

For further information and applications contact: Brian O’Riordan, deputy@lifeplatform.eu

 

Please submit a cover letter and CV to deputy@lifeplatform.eu by the closing date for applications: October 3, 2025

 

A significant policy development in Denmark is set to strengthen small-scale, low-impact fisheries through the introduction of a new quota retention scheme. This long-anticipated measure aligns closely with the objectives of our Danish member organisation, FSK-PO (Foreningen for Skånsomt Kystfiskeri).

The recent political agreement entitled “En ny kurs for dansk fiskeri“ (A New Course for Danish Fisheries) introduces a provision to retain fishing quotas within the national small-scale fisheries segment. This applies specifically to vessels measuring less than 17 metres in length and up to 50 GT. The measure constitutes a major advancement for local, sustainable fishing practices.

The scheme guarantees that once a quota is allocated to small-scale operators, it cannot be transferred out to industrial fleets. Once fishers join the scheme, they are required to trade their quotas with another small-scale fisher within the system, ensuring that the quota remains available for the future. For the next two years, however, fishers participating in the ‘open part’ of the scheme retain the option to exit and take their quota with them, provided they also withdraw completely from the small-scale sector.. This curbs the ability of larger operators to acquire and consolidate quotas, a trend that has eroded the viability of small-scale fishing communities across Europe. At the same time, it allows for quota transfers among small-scale fishing operators, thus enabling succession, adaptability, and resilience.

This retention framework directly addresses long-standing concerns raised by both LIFE and FSK-PO. It aims to ensure equitable access to fisheries resources for low-impact, small-scale operators. Furthermore, it supports the economic revitalisation of coastal communities and reinforces Denmark’s commitment to environmentally responsible fishing practices.

FSK-PO has played a pivotal role in advocating for this policy change. The organisation has issued a detailed statement in support of the new quota retention measure while emphasising the need for strong implementation and meaningful follow-through.

In particular, FSK-PO underline that it is essential for the quota retention mechanism to be genuinely binding and not subject to loopholes such as temporary registration or circumvention through shell companies. Additionally, incentives must be introduced to encourage fishers to remain within the small-scale segment—this includes support for gear innovation, marketing, and infrastructure. Finally, transparency in the administration of quota registries is vital for maintaining public confidence and ensuring accountability in the system.

This Danish initiative sets a significant precedent at the European level. It demonstrates that safeguarding quotas for low-impact fishers is both feasible and politically achievable. Moreover, it reflects a broader shift towards an ecosystem-based and socially responsible approach to fisheries governance, and offers a potential model for replication in other Member States.

LIFE will continue to monitor the implementation of this Danish scheme to ensure that it delivers tangible benefits to coastal communities and support its member organisations in promoting improvement in quota management frameworks across the European Union. 

Across the EU, fishers face stringent control measures. The captain has to formally report  estimated catches, in terms of weight and species. When these landings are controlled there is a margin of tolerance of 10% per species, although catches from the Baltic are allowed a margin of 20%. This is part of European efforts to combat illegal fishing and to ensure more accurate catch reporting for management.

The EU adopted their new Fisheries Control Regulation in 2024 with more stringent rules for catch reporting in place for all fishers. However, those vessels with the largest mixed and unsorted catches, mostly destined for fishmeal factories and thence exported outside of the Union, have been given an exemption from the margin of tolerance reporting requirements by the Commission, provided they land at one of seven Listed Ports. 

These ports are all located in Baltic Member States, with six in Denmark and one in Latvia. Denmark is the EU country with the highest volume of landings and unselective fishing by trawlers has now been further incentivised by the Commission through the listed ports provisions.  

According to the Commission, “the margin of tolerance is the maximum allowed difference between catch estimations by captains of fishing vessels and the actual weight of the fish caught. The (listed ports) derogation allows operators to benefit from a more flexible approach to catch reporting in logbooks when landing in listed ports.”

As LIFE already reported in this article, this exemption disproportionately benefits large vessels landing high-volume, low-value catches—particularly those in the fishmeal sector—allowing them to bypass stricter reporting requirements. This unfair system places other segments of the fleet at a competitive disadvantage and raises serious concerns about transparency and sustainability, highlighting the need for a level playing field in the industry.

Currently, the Commission has chosen to rely on ineffective methods for measuring bycatch, a Remote Electronic Monitoring (REM) system using CCTV video cameras. These have been in place for many years and have not proved effective in accurately reporting bycatch,  let alone analysing the species composition of unsorted small pelagic catches. 

LIFE advocates for using more effective, modern control techniques like eDNA to assess the species composition in unsorted mixed pelagic catches. In the Baltic, it should be utilised to monitor and identify the bycatches of cod and salmon in particular. DTU Aqua has conducted research and trials into this technology for several years and the regional Baltic Sea Fisheries Forum (BaltFish) control expert group has also discussed its application. Although additional work is necessary to develop a model through which eDNA data can give biomass estimates. Such a system would enable the total biomass of bycatch species to be accurately estimated, as has been proven to be already more effective than CCTV, especially for identifying the presence of salmon and cod in unsorted mixed pelagic catches. Therefore, such tests should be made compulsory for all landings at Listed Ports.

Salmon bycatch

Salmon is a valuable commercial species in the Baltic, facing multiple challenges and in urgent need of effective conservation and management. A huge area of concern is the significant but often overlooked bycatch of salmon in industrial pelagic catches. According to the ICES Baltic Salmon and Trout Assessment Working Group (ICES 2011, WGBAST), estimates have shown that around 0.1% of the total catch may consist of salmon in these industrial fisheries. This corresponds to approximately 100,000 salmon per year. By comparison, the total salmon quota for the entire Baltic Sea for 2025 was around 45,000 salmon. The pelagic vessels usually do not have a quota for salmon and should therefore be prohibited in fishing in areas where they are likely to take it as bycatch. 

There are around 40 unique salmon stocks along the Swedish coast. However, several of these stocks are in deep crisis, and recently we have seen a number of alarming reports from rivers where fishing has either been stopped or severely restricted due to record-low migrations. 

By failing to collect accurate data on bycatch of commercially and ecologically important species such as salmon and cod, the Commission is prioritising industrial fishing over fisheries conservation, severely compromising the future of the fishery, and privileging one fleet segment (fishmeal) whilst penalising another (for human consumption) and the communities that depend on it. 

We see an urgent need for modern, independent and effective controls to be applied to pelagic fishing and urge that an eDNA-based control programme be introduced without delay.

We therefore call on the Swedish government, which currently chairs the regional management body Baltfish, to launch a Joint Recommendation for such within the group as soon as possible.  

We must act now – we have the tools, and it’s a travesty to continue to turn a blind eye to these important vanishing fish and the derived social consequences.

LIFE Members gathered at the European Parliament alongside MEPs and key stakeholders to push for fairer access to resources and support for low-impact fishing. The event, hosted by LIFE and Blue Ventures, highlighted the vital role of the “forgotten fleet.” It comes at a crucial time as the EU reviews the effectiveness of the Common Fisheries Policy.

Learn more about it in the official PR here

 

Press review:

Fishing Daily

Industrias Pesqueras

The Skipper

Fisker Forum 

We are aquaculture

Mundus Maris