Mike Warner: Back to the Future
Back to the Future
By Mike Warner,
By Mike Warner,
By Mike Warner,
By my reckoning, it’s 34 years since I last crunched my way down the little shingle beach, beyond the boatyard at Felixstowe Ferry, in my trusty “Bullseye” thigh boots and clambered aboard the dinghy which was tender to Dougie Goodall’s fishing boat “Swallow II”. Little did I realise, as we rowed to the mooring, that this glorious, early summer’s morning back in 1982, would be my last trip made for many, many, years. The closing scene of a boyhood that had borne witness to the travails of our local inshore fishermen and that had come to forge and represent the passion for the industry and its participants, that I now feel so keenly.
During the summers I spent potting for crab and lobster and the winters longlining for cod and skate, I would willingly while away the precious hours of my holidays and weekends at sea in an open clinker-built motorboat, with no VHF, no life jacket, EPIRB, GPS, mobile phone, or indeed quota, meaning we fished for what we wanted where we wanted. For me, a perfectly idyllic (albeit often impoverished) existence that only the demise of my school days marked the end of, having instilled an innate love of seafood in me and moreover, a profound and deep-seated respect for those who endure not only the daily vagaries of weather, tide and season, but also the complex and often errant doings of the Common Fisheries Policy, etched out by officialdom with rigorous and determined enforcement.
But I’m here again, oilskin-donned and with the biggest of grins across my face as I’m rowed to the Valerie Ann (IH322) at the invitation of Under 10m skipper Ed Butters, to steam once more from this diminutive but much-loved, weatherboarded and weatherbeaten gem of Suffolk’s heritage coast, on the hunt for the first of the new season’s lobsters.
A southerly and sometimes overlooked cousin to the much vaunted holiday destinations of Aldeburgh and Southwold, Felixstowe Ferry with its rich maritime history, exudes an eclectic and individual charm that beckons thousands of visitors in a year-round pilgrimage from both sea and land. Situated two miles North of its expansive and dominating commercial neighbour, the Port of Felixstowe, that currently boasts one of the largest container terminals in the world, its underlying allure, undoubtedly stems from its timeless and unadulterated simplicity and the fact that development over the years has been tempered. An individual and indeed very autonomous community exists here with the inhabitants benefiting from a church, (St Nicholas) a pub (The Ferry Boat) and two cafés.
John White, fisherman, boat-builder and now Harbourmaster tells me exactly what 70 years as a Ferry resident and fisherman has meant to him and how times have changed. “My parents moved here after the war when my father left the Merchant Navy,” he recalls. “He started fishing here and I’ve always been part of that scene”
A mainstay of the community, the fishing fleet back then, numbered many more skippers and crew, but still a significant number operate from the mouth of the Deben today, with currently nine full-time registered craft. “Of course”, continues John, “nowadays we actually have more boats fishing out of here commercially than Lowestoft.” A galling fact, when you consider the historical status and importance of the East coast’s most famous trademark, but now erstwhile fishing port.
Yachting and the services it demands, plays an increasingly important part too in the economy here. Visiting UK sailors and from nearby Belgium (only 80 miles), Holland and France, drop in regularly for supplies and fuel or just to appreciate the stunning scenery of the surrounding Suffolk coastline and countryside with views up river to further moorings at Ramsholt, Waldringfield and Woodbridge. Centrepiece is the well-known and much photographed jetty, where the Ferry has run for generations, latterly skippered by John and before that, his father in law and well-respected local figure Charlie Brinkley, providing travellers with a crucial, time-saving crossing to Bawdsey on the northerly bank and still hugely popular with walkers and cyclists.
“We get hundreds of vessels visit over the course of a year” enthuses John. Being Harbourmaster he also acts as a pilot for those visitors requiring assistance in bringing their vessels safely into the Deben. Facilities abound here too, for boating enthusiasts under either motor or sail. The sailing club is well established with a thriving membership and the Ferry Boatyard affords repairs, haul-outs, chandlery and moorings, as well as still building a number of boats from basic shell-like dinghies to the beautiful lines of modern 26ft fishing boats, one of which currently resides in the workshop, for completion this year and destined to remain fishing here, carrying on a worthy tradition of manufacturing quality sea boats, of which Andrew Moore and his team at the Felixstowe Ferry yard are justifiably proud.
As we leave the mooring and motor steadily against the young flood tide out to the lobster grounds, where Ed’s pots lie fishing, I notice the shingle bars and spits that mark the river entrance have shifted considerably since my days afloat here. Ed points out the depth of water we have to negotiate, on the sounder and indicates the position of the channel buoys which John monitors constantly to ensure they always mark the most safely navigable route.
“At High Water we can still nip over the bar with our draft,” Ed explains, “but you don’t want to be caught short coming home with a boat full of fish and not much freeboard, so it pays to be careful.”
Earlier, John reminded me that in summer, the submerged shingle bar with its confused waters, harbours schools of wily bass, eager to swallow tempting lures, although now recreationally restricted since the enforcement of their new catch regulations in January.
Steaming now into the northerly inshore sea area, locally known as East Lane, the familiar landmark of Bawdsey Manor looms up to port, it’s turrets and wings once playing host to the team headed by Robert Watson-Watt and his critical wartime invention of radar, which seems oddly symbolic as we cruise past, toward the first dahn (marker buoy).
With lobsters our main quarry, Ed is anxious to know what his pots might yield, having not hauled since Easter – a constant blow keeping him ashore since then. “We may find some of them have moved” he tuts. “I shoot them in lines and each end pot is a heavier one to act as a marker.” The dahns hove into view and I’m reminded that with a strong tide running now, quite often the gear will “run under” only popping back into sight as it slackens towards High Water.
Lobsters have been plentiful, in recent years, although not in such numbers as John White and his father saw immediately after World War II, when a lack of fishing meant massive recruitment and low mortality for that species. Now the pressure is back on though, as restricted areas for the nearby wind farm developments and associated cabling work, have meant that fishermen have been forced into ever decreasing spots, with individual gear often shot in close proximity on the more productive patches. As Ed hauls the first pot, I’m told that at present the gear is being fished as “singles” whereas later in the season with more fish on the ground then they’re made up into “shanks” and fished eight pots in line, as a string.
Nothing on the first haul but the second pot yields a keeper, just exceeding the gauge on its carapace, another one on the third and a selection of cock and hen crabs appear too as we haul, mainly on the muddier ground, with the lobsters dominating the cleaner rock.
With several lobsters in the box, I set to work banding the claws as Ed hauls, making sure I at least contribute something to the morning. I’m encouraged to see the number of smaller, undersized fish (or “Nancies” as my father used to call them) that we return unharmed to the water. One more “shed” or moult for those specimens and they themselves will be going ashore.
Ed and his brother Rob (out too this morning, fishing for cod and skate over the horizon) sell most of their catch locally. Dave Hicks of SpringTide Fish, right by the jetty, buys as much local fish and shellfish as he can from the Butters’ and the other Ferry fishermen with most of the residue travelling the 50 miles by road to the auctions at Lowestoft. Dave’s business at the Ferry is another rung on the sustainability ladder of this vibrant little community, as customers flock year round to his hut to purchase a range of fresh, top quality seafood, keeping money and value within the locality.
The wind freshens now as the sun gets up and Ed skilfully re-shoots all the pots back in their correct rows rebaiting each one with the standard salted herring, caught in the same waters months before. The inshore seas of this coast are alive with herring at present, although they currently attract little premium, being now “spent” after spawning, sustaining only hungry cod and bass before they once more, move off to deeper water.
The final pot disappears over the gunwales and we make for home on the last of the flood. An exciting morning with a fascinating and hugely nostalgic insight into low-impact and selective fishing carried out in time-honoured fashion using techniques which the years have failed to erode.
As we tie up and decant the catch into the “keep pot” on the mooring, I reflect on the emotions and feelings that have drawn me back here after so long. Saltwater is definitely in my blood and it runs stronger with each trip I make to harbours, markets, auctions and of course to sea. Fishing out of Felixstowe Ferry again, has crystallised this for me. I feel such a strong affinity for the place and its inhabitants and it has only further cemented my feelings and passion to be involved in supporting this bastion of the last wild hunters, as much as I can.
Sitting later with a coffee in hand, on the decking of the “Winkle” cafe overlooking the jetty, whilst waiting for Rob to come ashore and watching the different elements of this community at work and play, it’s easy to see why Felixstowe Ferry still thrives. It is sustainable. Fishing and its support services, manufacturing, retail, food service, tourism and recreation all combine beautifully here in a microcosm, on a relatively small but critically defined scale.
It’s truly amazing to both witness and experience and now even more so for me – I’ve just applied for a mooring.
There is much in the new Technical Measures Regulation proposal, published by DG Mare on March 11, that is to be welcomed (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0134&from=EN).
For example, there are provisions for regional implementation through Multi-Annual Plans (MAPs); for incentives to be provided to fishing vessels that use gears that are more selective and with less impact on the marine environment (in line with Article 17); and towards a balanced representation of stakeholders on the Advisory Councils.
It is also to be welcomed that the need for technical measures to be applied to recreational fisheries is taken account of.
The rationale for a new regulation are spelt out in the Executive Summary of the impact assessment, available on the link http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0056&from=EN.
However, overall, like previous technical measures, the proposal fails to differentiate sufficiently between small and large scale, and mobile and fixed gear operations.
In the preamble, the proposal notes that “the catching sector comprising around 82,000 vessels and employing 98,500 Full-time equivalents (FTE) is the most affected by potential changes to the technical measures regulations. Of these approximate 82,000 fishing vessels, almost 98% of them would be classified as micro-enterprises employing fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed €2 million. With such a high proportion of the sector being micro-enterprises exempting them from this proposal would undermine the conservation objectives of the CFP as few fishing enterprises would be governed by the general rules.”
However, not once in the proposal is reference made to the small scale fleet segment (under 12 metres and using non-towed gear) which comprises 80% of the 82,000 vessels mentioned above. That said, some exemptions can be found in the Annexes to rules applied to vessels in the Baltic Sea under 8 metres and under 12 metres, such as permissible length of passive nets, and access to closed areas.
LIFE agrees that the majority sector (80% of the fleet), which is small in scale should not be exempted. However, the measures should take more account of the specificities and different levels of impact of the two distinct – small and large – fleet segments. The proposal does not go far enough in this regard.
It must be recalled that whilst the Green Paper on the CFP reform had floated the idea of adopting a differentiated approach to managing small and large scale fishery activities, and this was endorsed by the European Parliament, such an approach was not adopted in the new CFP. However, despite this, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund Regulation ((EU) No 508/2014) does include many provisions designed to defend and support small scale fisheries, as does the Commission Delegated Regulation ((EU) 2015/242) laying down detailed rules on the functioning of the Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy.
On regionalisation, the preamble notes that the framework for the regulation of technical measures “should establish general rules to apply across all Union waters and provide for the creation of technical measures that take account of the regional specificities of fisheries through the process of regionalisation introduced by the CFP”, and “where no technical measures are in place at regional level then defined baseline standards should apply.” It notes that “Member States in conjunction with stakeholders can develop joint recommendations for appropriate technical measures that deviate from the baselines in accordance with the regionalisation process set out in the CFP”.
It is therefore vital that small scale fishers become more active at the regional level, especially through engagement with the Advisory Councils (ACs). The new CFP contains specific provisions to promote a balanced representation of stakeholders in the ACs, bolstered by this new proposal, including reserving spaces in the ACs (at Executive Committee level) for the participation of small scale fishers and their representatives.
Rightly, the focus of the new DG Mare proposal is on the taking and landing of fishery resources, on the operation of fishing gears, and the interaction of fishing activities with marine ecosystems. Its specific objectives are to provide protection for juveniles and spawning aggregations; to minimize and where possible eliminate discards; minimize the environmental impact of fishing on marine habitats; and to promote compliance with the Habitats, Wild Birds, Marine Strategy Framework and Water Framework Directives. All good stuff.
The proposal sets out measures and conditions to be applied for the use of towed and static gears, which are detailed in the Annexes according to regional sea basins and sensitive habitats.
However, in the case of towed gears (Article 9), no account is taken of the effects of engine power and gear design on selectivity (mesh size opening), or of the environmental impact of ground ropes, trawl doors, twin rigging “clumps”, or of the shoes and beams of otter and beam trawls on marine fauna and habitats. Some provisions should be included on parameters relating to the size and weight of ground gear and net design generally, including engine power. Such provisions may not be easy to apply, but a balance is needed between giving fishers the scope and responsibility for reducing their impacts, whilst ensuring that regulations are not flouted.
It must also be noted that originally the landings obligation came into being as an incentive to fishers to design and use fishing gears that would avoid aggregations of juveniles, spawning adults, prohibited species, and other species that may choke the fishery. With the ongoing uncertainties as to the final shape of the landings obligation, the Technical Measures Regulation is needed mainly as a back up to limit the negative impacts of fishing. At the same time, it is important to avoid over specifying rules on technical measures that would rob fishers of the flexibility needed to comply with the landing obligation and make a living.
LIFE Members from the Western Baltic Sea also point out that reported levels of by-catch of undersize cod from trawl fisheries is much higher than the 2% reported. In practice this can be as high as 40%.
LIFE is also concerned that previous measures restricting the use of pulse beam trawling to “no more than 5% of the beam trawler fleets of Member States” appears to have been lifted. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) observed that as of November 2015 “84 licences had been issued to use pulse trawl in the Netherlands for scientific research and data collection purposes. This is well in excess of the 5% limit included in the original legislation. The increases in the number of licences issued were agreed at EU level in 2010 and 2014” and “it would seem (that these increases) are over and above levels that would normally be associated with scientific research.”
Given the significant lack of scientific evidence regarding the impacts of this type of fishing on both target and non-target species and on the wider marine environment, though clear damage caused to some species of fish by electric pulses has been found, LIFE questions why DG Mare’s new proposal has removed this limitation? And, if there is no longer such a limitation, how does the Commission propose to monitor and regulate the use and the impacts of this gear? The above comments from ICES indicate that the beam trawl fleet finds this fishing method to be commercially advantageous, and the increasing numbers of vessels using this potentially destructive method has no scientific rationale, and flies in the face of the precautionary approach.
LIFE also questions whether the measures and the capacity for monitoring, control and surveillance at Member State level are sufficient to ensure that the fleet of pelagic super trawlers fishing in coastal waters off Ireland, UK, France and other Member States comply with quota regulations and regulations concerning discards and by-catch. Recent anecdotal reports indicate that little or no control can be applied to the operation of these vessels to prevent unwanted catches of prohibited species, and catches of species that are over quota and undersize. Due the methods used to catch and retain the catches on board, the crew are often not aware of what is in the catch till it is pumped ashore into processing facilities.
But the devil is in the detail, and to get to grips with the implications of this new proposal, some immersion in the 11 Annexes to the proposal is required. These set out the baseline measures that will apply in the absence of measures being put in place regionally. They include baseline mesh sizes, minimum conservation reference sizes (MCRS), closed or restricted areas to protect juveniles and spawning fish and other regionally specific measures.
Annex I lists the prohibited species that if caught as bycatch must be returned immediately to the sea; Annex II provides a list of areas closed to fishing established for the protection of sensitive habitats (referred to in Article 13), with details of the restrictions to be applied on the carrying and use of fishing gears, use of VMS, reporting, vessel registration, etc.; and Annex III provides a list of species that are prohibited for capture with driftnets.
Annexes IV to XI contain baseline measures by sea basin (i.e. North Sea, Baltic, Northwestern waters, Southwestern waters, Mediterranean, Black Sea and the outermost regions).
It is therefore at the regional level that most effort will be required to ensure that small scale low impact activities are not tarred with the same broad brush as larger scale high impact activities.
Small scale needs to get its act together; it needs to get to the decision taking table, be it in the ACs, with their national authorities, or with parliamentarians at national and European level. Tomorrow is not soon enough to ensure that issues affecting small scale coastal fishery activities are not overlooked or marginalised in the implementation of the CFP.
There is much in the new Technical Measures Regulation proposal, published by DG Mare on March 11, that is to be welcomed (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0134&from=EN).
For example, there are provisions for regional implementation through Multi-Annual Plans (MAPs); for incentives to be provided to fishing vessels that use gears that are more selective and with less impact on the marine environment (in line with Article 17); and towards a balanced representation of stakeholders on the Advisory Councils.
It is also to be welcomed that the need for technical measures to be applied to recreational fisheries is taken account of.
The rationale for a new regulation are spelt out in the Executive Summary of the impact assessment, available on the link http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0056&from=EN.
However, overall, like previous technical measures, the proposal fails to differentiate sufficiently between small and large scale, and mobile and fixed gear operations.
In the preamble, the proposal notes that “the catching sector comprising around 82,000 vessels and employing 98,500 Full-time equivalents (FTE) is the most affected by potential changes to the technical measures regulations. Of these approximate 82,000 fishing vessels, almost 98% of them would be classified as micro-enterprises employing fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed €2 million. With such a high proportion of the sector being micro-enterprises exempting them from this proposal would undermine the conservation objectives of the CFP as few fishing enterprises would be governed by the general rules.”
However, not once in the proposal is reference made to the small scale fleet segment (under 12 metres and using non-towed gear) which comprises 80% of the 82,000 vessels mentioned above. That said, some exemptions can be found in the Annexes to rules applied to vessels in the Baltic Sea under 8 metres and under 12 metres, such as permissible length of passive nets, and access to closed areas.
LIFE agrees that the majority sector (80% of the fleet), which is small in scale should not be exempted. However, the measures should take more account of the specificities and different levels of impact of the two distinct – small and large – fleet segments. The proposal does not go far enough in this regard.
It must be recalled that whilst the Green Paper on the CFP reform had floated the idea of adopting a differentiated approach to managing small and large scale fishery activities, and this was endorsed by the European Parliament, such an approach was not adopted in the new CFP. However, despite this, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund Regulation ((EU) No 508/2014) does include many provisions designed to defend and support small scale fisheries, as does the Commission Delegated Regulation ((EU) 2015/242) laying down detailed rules on the functioning of the Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy.
On regionalisation, the preamble notes that the framework for the regulation of technical measures “should establish general rules to apply across all Union waters and provide for the creation of technical measures that take account of the regional specificities of fisheries through the process of regionalisation introduced by the CFP”, and “where no technical measures are in place at regional level then defined baseline standards should apply.” It notes that “Member States in conjunction with stakeholders can develop joint recommendations for appropriate technical measures that deviate from the baselines in accordance with the regionalisation process set out in the CFP”.
It is therefore vital that small scale fishers become more active at the regional level, especially through engagement with the Advisory Councils (ACs). The new CFP contains specific provisions to promote a balanced representation of stakeholders in the ACs, bolstered by this new proposal, including reserving spaces in the ACs (at Executive Committee level) for the participation of small scale fishers and their representatives.
Rightly, the focus of the new DG Mare proposal is on the taking and landing of fishery resources, on the operation of fishing gears, and the interaction of fishing activities with marine ecosystems. Its specific objectives are to provide protection for juveniles and spawning aggregations; to minimize and where possible eliminate discards; minimize the environmental impact of fishing on marine habitats; and to promote compliance with the Habitats, Wild Birds, Marine Strategy Framework and Water Framework Directives. All good stuff.
The proposal sets out measures and conditions to be applied for the use of towed and static gears, which are detailed in the Annexes according to regional sea basins and sensitive habitats.
However, in the case of towed gears (Article 9), no account is taken of the effects of engine power and gear design on selectivity (mesh size opening), or of the environmental impact of ground ropes, trawl doors, twin rigging “clumps”, or of the shoes and beams of otter and beam trawls on marine fauna and habitats. Some provisions should be included on parameters relating to the size and weight of ground gear and net design generally, including engine power. Such provisions may not be easy to apply, but a balance is needed between giving fishers the scope and responsibility for reducing their impacts, whilst ensuring that regulations are not flouted.
It must also be noted that originally the landings obligation came into being as an incentive to fishers to design and use fishing gears that would avoid aggregations of juveniles, spawning adults, prohibited species, and other species that may choke the fishery. With the ongoing uncertainties as to the final shape of the landings obligation, the Technical Measures Regulation is needed mainly as a back up to limit the negative impacts of fishing. At the same time, it is important to avoid over specifying rules on technical measures that would rob fishers of the flexibility needed to comply with the landing obligation and make a living.
LIFE Members from the Western Baltic Sea also point out that reported levels of by-catch of undersize cod from trawl fisheries is much higher than the 2% reported. In practice this can be as high as 40%.
LIFE is also concerned that previous measures restricting the use of pulse beam trawling to “no more than 5% of the beam trawler fleets of Member States” appears to have been lifted. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) observed that as of November 2015 “84 licences had been issued to use pulse trawl in the Netherlands for scientific research and data collection purposes. This is well in excess of the 5% limit included in the original legislation. The increases in the number of licences issued were agreed at EU level in 2010 and 2014” and “it would seem (that these increases) are over and above levels that would normally be associated with scientific research.”
Given the significant lack of scientific evidence regarding the impacts of this type of fishing on both target and non-target species and on the wider marine environment, though clear damage caused to some species of fish by electric pulses has been found, LIFE questions why DG Mare’s new proposal has removed this limitation? And, if there is no longer such a limitation, how does the Commission propose to monitor and regulate the use and the impacts of this gear? The above comments from ICES indicate that the beam trawl fleet finds this fishing method to be commercially advantageous, and the increasing numbers of vessels using this potentially destructive method has no scientific rationale, and flies in the face of the precautionary approach.
LIFE also questions whether the measures and the capacity for monitoring, control and surveillance at Member State level are sufficient to ensure that the fleet of pelagic super trawlers fishing in coastal waters off Ireland, UK, France and other Member States comply with quota regulations and regulations concerning discards and by-catch. Recent anecdotal reports indicate that little or no control can be applied to the operation of these vessels to prevent unwanted catches of prohibited species, and catches of species that are over quota and undersize. Due the methods used to catch and retain the catches on board, the crew are often not aware of what is in the catch till it is pumped ashore into processing facilities.
But the devil is in the detail, and to get to grips with the implications of this new proposal, some immersion in the 11 Annexes to the proposal is required. These set out the baseline measures that will apply in the absence of measures being put in place regionally. They include baseline mesh sizes, minimum conservation reference sizes (MCRS), closed or restricted areas to protect juveniles and spawning fish and other regionally specific measures.
Annex I lists the prohibited species that if caught as bycatch must be returned immediately to the sea; Annex II provides a list of areas closed to fishing established for the protection of sensitive habitats (referred to in Article 13), with details of the restrictions to be applied on the carrying and use of fishing gears, use of VMS, reporting, vessel registration, etc.; and Annex III provides a list of species that are prohibited for capture with driftnets.
Annexes IV to XI contain baseline measures by sea basin (i.e. North Sea, Baltic, Northwestern waters, Southwestern waters, Mediterranean, Black Sea and the outermost regions).
It is therefore at the regional level that most effort will be required to ensure that small scale low impact activities are not tarred with the same broad brush as larger scale high impact activities.
Small scale needs to get its act together; it needs to get to the decision taking table, be it in the ACs, with their national authorities, or with parliamentarians at national and European level. Tomorrow is not soon enough to ensure that issues affecting small scale coastal fishery activities are not overlooked or marginalised in the implementation of the CFP.
There is much in the new Technical Measures Regulation proposal, published by DG Mare on March 11, that is to be welcomed (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0134&from=EN).
For example, there are provisions for regional implementation through Multi-Annual Plans (MAPs); for incentives to be provided to fishing vessels that use gears that are more selective and with less impact on the marine environment (in line with Article 17); and towards a balanced representation of stakeholders on the Advisory Councils.
It is also to be welcomed that the need for technical measures to be applied to recreational fisheries is taken account of.
The rationale for a new regulation are spelt out in the Executive Summary of the impact assessment, available on the link http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0056&from=EN.
However, overall, like previous technical measures, the proposal fails to differentiate sufficiently between small and large scale, and mobile and fixed gear operations.
In the preamble, the proposal notes that “the catching sector comprising around 82,000 vessels and employing 98,500 Full-time equivalents (FTE) is the most affected by potential changes to the technical measures regulations. Of these approximate 82,000 fishing vessels, almost 98% of them would be classified as micro-enterprises employing fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed €2 million. With such a high proportion of the sector being micro-enterprises exempting them from this proposal would undermine the conservation objectives of the CFP as few fishing enterprises would be governed by the general rules.”
However, not once in the proposal is reference made to the small scale fleet segment (under 12 metres and using non-towed gear) which comprises 80% of the 82,000 vessels mentioned above. That said, some exemptions can be found in the Annexes to rules applied to vessels in the Baltic Sea under 8 metres and under 12 metres, such as permissible length of passive nets, and access to closed areas.
LIFE agrees that the majority sector (80% of the fleet), which is small in scale should not be exempted. However, the measures should take more account of the specificities and different levels of impact of the two distinct – small and large – fleet segments. The proposal does not go far enough in this regard.
It must be recalled that whilst the Green Paper on the CFP reform had floated the idea of adopting a differentiated approach to managing small and large scale fishery activities, and this was endorsed by the European Parliament, such an approach was not adopted in the new CFP. However, despite this, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund Regulation ((EU) No 508/2014) does include many provisions designed to defend and support small scale fisheries, as does the Commission Delegated Regulation ((EU) 2015/242) laying down detailed rules on the functioning of the Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy.
On regionalisation, the preamble notes that the framework for the regulation of technical measures “should establish general rules to apply across all Union waters and provide for the creation of technical measures that take account of the regional specificities of fisheries through the process of regionalisation introduced by the CFP”, and “where no technical measures are in place at regional level then defined baseline standards should apply.” It notes that “Member States in conjunction with stakeholders can develop joint recommendations for appropriate technical measures that deviate from the baselines in accordance with the regionalisation process set out in the CFP”.
It is therefore vital that small scale fishers become more active at the regional level, especially through engagement with the Advisory Councils (ACs). The new CFP contains specific provisions to promote a balanced representation of stakeholders in the ACs, bolstered by this new proposal, including reserving spaces in the ACs (at Executive Committee level) for the participation of small scale fishers and their representatives.
Rightly, the focus of the new DG Mare proposal is on the taking and landing of fishery resources, on the operation of fishing gears, and the interaction of fishing activities with marine ecosystems. Its specific objectives are to provide protection for juveniles and spawning aggregations; to minimize and where possible eliminate discards; minimize the environmental impact of fishing on marine habitats; and to promote compliance with the Habitats, Wild Birds, Marine Strategy Framework and Water Framework Directives. All good stuff.
The proposal sets out measures and conditions to be applied for the use of towed and static gears, which are detailed in the Annexes according to regional sea basins and sensitive habitats.
However, in the case of towed gears (Article 9), no account is taken of the effects of engine power and gear design on selectivity (mesh size opening), or of the environmental impact of ground ropes, trawl doors, twin rigging “clumps”, or of the shoes and beams of otter and beam trawls on marine fauna and habitats. Some provisions should be included on parameters relating to the size and weight of ground gear and net design generally, including engine power. Such provisions may not be easy to apply, but a balance is needed between giving fishers the scope and responsibility for reducing their impacts, whilst ensuring that regulations are not flouted.
It must also be noted that originally the landings obligation came into being as an incentive to fishers to design and use fishing gears that would avoid aggregations of juveniles, spawning adults, prohibited species, and other species that may choke the fishery. With the ongoing uncertainties as to the final shape of the landings obligation, the Technical Measures Regulation is needed mainly as a back up to limit the negative impacts of fishing. At the same time, it is important to avoid over specifying rules on technical measures that would rob fishers of the flexibility needed to comply with the landing obligation and make a living.
LIFE Members from the Western Baltic Sea also point out that reported levels of by-catch of undersize cod from trawl fisheries is much higher than the 2% reported. In practice this can be as high as 40%.
LIFE is also concerned that previous measures restricting the use of pulse beam trawling to “no more than 5% of the beam trawler fleets of Member States” appears to have been lifted. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) observed that as of November 2015 “84 licences had been issued to use pulse trawl in the Netherlands for scientific research and data collection purposes. This is well in excess of the 5% limit included in the original legislation. The increases in the number of licences issued were agreed at EU level in 2010 and 2014” and “it would seem (that these increases) are over and above levels that would normally be associated with scientific research.”
Given the significant lack of scientific evidence regarding the impacts of this type of fishing on both target and non-target species and on the wider marine environment, though clear damage caused to some species of fish by electric pulses has been found, LIFE questions why DG Mare’s new proposal has removed this limitation? And, if there is no longer such a limitation, how does the Commission propose to monitor and regulate the use and the impacts of this gear? The above comments from ICES indicate that the beam trawl fleet finds this fishing method to be commercially advantageous, and the increasing numbers of vessels using this potentially destructive method has no scientific rationale, and flies in the face of the precautionary approach.
LIFE also questions whether the measures and the capacity for monitoring, control and surveillance at Member State level are sufficient to ensure that the fleet of pelagic super trawlers fishing in coastal waters off Ireland, UK, France and other Member States comply with quota regulations and regulations concerning discards and by-catch. Recent anecdotal reports indicate that little or no control can be applied to the operation of these vessels to prevent unwanted catches of prohibited species, and catches of species that are over quota and undersize. Due the methods used to catch and retain the catches on board, the crew are often not aware of what is in the catch till it is pumped ashore into processing facilities.
But the devil is in the detail, and to get to grips with the implications of this new proposal, some immersion in the 11 Annexes to the proposal is required. These set out the baseline measures that will apply in the absence of measures being put in place regionally. They include baseline mesh sizes, minimum conservation reference sizes (MCRS), closed or restricted areas to protect juveniles and spawning fish and other regionally specific measures.
Annex I lists the prohibited species that if caught as bycatch must be returned immediately to the sea; Annex II provides a list of areas closed to fishing established for the protection of sensitive habitats (referred to in Article 13), with details of the restrictions to be applied on the carrying and use of fishing gears, use of VMS, reporting, vessel registration, etc.; and Annex III provides a list of species that are prohibited for capture with driftnets.
Annexes IV to XI contain baseline measures by sea basin (i.e. North Sea, Baltic, Northwestern waters, Southwestern waters, Mediterranean, Black Sea and the outermost regions).
It is therefore at the regional level that most effort will be required to ensure that small scale low impact activities are not tarred with the same broad brush as larger scale high impact activities.
Small scale needs to get its act together; it needs to get to the decision taking table, be it in the ACs, with their national authorities, or with parliamentarians at national and European level. Tomorrow is not soon enough to ensure that issues affecting small scale coastal fishery activities are not overlooked or marginalised in the implementation of the CFP.
Brussels, 12 April 2016
There is much in the new Technical Measures Regulation proposal, published by DG Mare on March 11, that is to be welcomed (see http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0134&from=EN).
For example, there are provisions for regional implementation through Multi-Annual Plans (MAPs); for incentives to be provided to fishing vessels that use gears that are more selective and with less impact on the marine environment (in line with Article 17); and towards a balanced representation of stakeholders on the Advisory Councils.
It is also to be welcomed that the need for technical measures to be applied to recreational fisheries is taken account of.
The rationale for a new regulation are spelt out in the Executive Summary of the impact assessment, available on the link http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0056&from=EN.
However, overall, like previous technical measures, the proposal fails to differentiate sufficiently between small and large scale, and mobile and fixed gear operations.
In the preamble, the proposal notes that “the catching sector comprising around 82,000 vessels and employing 98,500 Full-time equivalents (FTE) is the most affected by potential changes to the technical measures regulations. Of these approximate 82,000 fishing vessels, almost 98% of them would be classified as micro-enterprises employing fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed €2 million. With such a high proportion of the sector being micro-enterprises exempting them from this proposal would undermine the conservation objectives of the CFP as few fishing enterprises would be governed by the general rules.”
However, not once in the proposal is reference made to the small scale fleet segment (under 12 metres and using non-towed gear) which comprises 80% of the 82,000 vessels mentioned above. That said, some exemptions can be found in the Annexes to rules applied to vessels in the Baltic Sea under 8 metres and under 12 metres, such as permissible length of passive nets, and access to closed areas.
LIFE agrees that the majority sector (80% of the fleet), which is small in scale should not be exempted. However, the measures should take more account of the specificities and different levels of impact of the two distinct – small and large – fleet segments. The proposal does not go far enough in this regard.
It must be recalled that whilst the Green Paper on the CFP reform had floated the idea of adopting a differentiated approach to managing small and large scale fishery activities, and this was endorsed by the European Parliament, such an approach was not adopted in the new CFP. However, despite this, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund Regulation ((EU) No 508/2014) does include many provisions designed to defend and support small scale fisheries, as does the Commission Delegated Regulation ((EU) 2015/242) laying down detailed rules on the functioning of the Advisory Councils under the Common Fisheries Policy.
On regionalisation, the preamble notes that the framework for the regulation of technical measures “should establish general rules to apply across all Union waters and provide for the creation of technical measures that take account of the regional specificities of fisheries through the process of regionalisation introduced by the CFP”, and “where no technical measures are in place at regional level then defined baseline standards should apply.” It notes that “Member States in conjunction with stakeholders can develop joint recommendations for appropriate technical measures that deviate from the baselines in accordance with the regionalisation process set out in the CFP”.
It is therefore vital that small scale fishers become more active at the regional level, especially through engagement with the Advisory Councils (ACs). The new CFP contains specific provisions to promote a balanced representation of stakeholders in the ACs, bolstered by this new proposal, including reserving spaces in the ACs (at Executive Committee level) for the participation of small scale fishers and their representatives.
Rightly, the focus of the new DG Mare proposal is on the taking and landing of fishery resources, on the operation of fishing gears, and the interaction of fishing activities with marine ecosystems. Its specific objectives are to provide protection for juveniles and spawning aggregations; to minimize and where possible eliminate discards; minimize the environmental impact of fishing on marine habitats; and to promote compliance with the Habitats, Wild Birds, Marine Strategy Framework and Water Framework Directives. All good stuff.
The proposal sets out measures and conditions to be applied for the use of towed and static gears, which are detailed in the Annexes according to regional sea basins and sensitive habitats.
However, in the case of towed gears (Article 9), no account is taken of the effects of engine power and gear design on selectivity (mesh size opening), or of the environmental impact of ground ropes, trawl doors, twin rigging “clumps”, or of the shoes and beams of otter and beam trawls on marine fauna and habitats. Some provisions should be included on parameters relating to the size and weight of ground gear and net design generally, including engine power. Such provisions may not be easy to apply, but a balance is needed between giving fishers the scope and responsibility for reducing their impacts, whilst ensuring that regulations are not flouted.
It must also be noted that originally the landings obligation came into being as an incentive to fishers to design and use fishing gears that would avoid aggregations of juveniles, spawning adults, prohibited species, and other species that may choke the fishery. With the ongoing uncertainties as to the final shape of the landings obligation, the Technical Measures Regulation is needed mainly as a back up to limit the negative impacts of fishing. At the same time, it is important to avoid over specifying rules on technical measures that would rob fishers of the flexibility needed to comply with the landing obligation and make a living.
LIFE Members from the Western Baltic Sea also point out that reported levels of by-catch of undersize cod from trawl fisheries is much higher than the 2% reported. In practice this can be as high as 40%.
LIFE is also concerned that previous measures restricting the use of pulse beam trawling to “no more than 5% of the beam trawler fleets of Member States” appears to have been lifted. The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) observed that as of November 2015 “84 licences had been issued to use pulse trawl in the Netherlands for scientific research and data collection purposes. This is well in excess of the 5% limit included in the original legislation. The increases in the number of licences issued were agreed at EU level in 2010 and 2014” and “it would seem (that these increases) are over and above levels that would normally be associated with scientific research.”
Given the significant lack of scientific evidence regarding the impacts of this type of fishing on both target and non-target species and on the wider marine environment, though clear damage caused to some species of fish by electric pulses has been found, LIFE questions why DG Mare’s new proposal has removed this limitation? And, if there is no longer such a limitation, how does the Commission propose to monitor and regulate the use and the impacts of this gear? The above comments from ICES indicate that the beam trawl fleet finds this fishing method to be commercially advantageous, and the increasing numbers of vessels using this potentially destructive method has no scientific rationale, and flies in the face of the precautionary approach.
LIFE also questions whether the measures and the capacity for monitoring, control and surveillance at Member State level are sufficient to ensure that the fleet of pelagic super trawlers fishing in coastal waters off Ireland, UK, France and other Member States comply with quota regulations and regulations concerning discards and by-catch. Recent anecdotal reports indicate that little or no control can be applied to the operation of these vessels to prevent unwanted catches of prohibited species, and catches of species that are over quota and undersize. Due the methods used to catch and retain the catches on board, the crew are often not aware of what is in the catch till it is pumped ashore into processing facilities.
But the devil is in the detail, and to get to grips with the implications of this new proposal, some immersion in the 11 Annexes to the proposal is required. These set out the baseline measures that will apply in the absence of measures being put in place regionally. They include baseline mesh sizes, minimum conservation reference sizes (MCRS), closed or restricted areas to protect juveniles and spawning fish and other regionally specific measures.
Annex I lists the prohibited species that if caught as bycatch must be returned immediately to the sea; Annex II provides a list of areas closed to fishing established for the protection of sensitive habitats (referred to in Article 13), with details of the restrictions to be applied on the carrying and use of fishing gears, use of VMS, reporting, vessel registration, etc.; and Annex III provides a list of species that are prohibited for capture with driftnets.
Annexes IV to XI contain baseline measures by sea basin (i.e. North Sea, Baltic, Northwestern waters, Southwestern waters, Mediterranean, Black Sea and the outermost regions).
It is therefore at the regional level that most effort will be required to ensure that small scale low impact activities are not tarred with the same broad brush as larger scale high impact activities.
Small scale needs to get its act together; it needs to get to the decision taking table, be it in the ACs, with their national authorities, or with parliamentarians at national and European level. Tomorrow is not soon enough to ensure that issues affecting small scale coastal fishery activities are not overlooked or marginalised in the implementation of the CFP.
WYDARZENIA MIESIĄCA
Spotkanie w DG Mare w sprawie kwestii bałtyckich
Czwartego marca LIFE zorganizowało spotkanie w Dyrekcji Generalnej ds. Gospodarki Morskiej i Rybołówstwa (DG Mare) w Komisji Europejskiej. Celem było omówienie spraw dotyczących rybactwa na małą skalę na Bałtyku zachodnim. W spotkaniu wziął udział personel brukselskiego biura LIFE, Wolfgang Albrecht (dyrektor LIFE Niemcy), Katarzyna Wysocka (dyrektor LIFE Polska), David Lange i Hanne Lyng Winter (przedstawiciele FSK – Dania, członka LIFE). Spotkanie odbyło się w siedzibie DG Mare i uczestniczyli w nim po stronie Komisji: Bernard, Friess, Dyrektor Dyrekcji C (Atlantyk) i pełniący funkcję Dyrektora Dyrektoriatu E (Bałtyk), oraz jego zespół.
Główne poruszone na spotkaniu tematy to: obecny stan stad, zamknięcie łowiska dorsza, selektywność i przyłów trawlerów, wyłączenia dla połowów przemysłowych, sprawiedliwe traktowanie rybaków niskoskalowych i uczestnictwo rybaków poławiających na małą skalę w Radach Doradczych (RAC). Spotkanie było bardzo obiecujące, a Bernhard Friess zaproponował częstsze wizyty LIFE i jego członków, w celu omawiania ważkich kwestii.
Regionalna konferencja GFCM pt. „Budowanie przyszłości zrównoważonych, małoskalowych rybaków na morzu Śródziemnym i Czarnym”
Personel LIFE wziął udział w Regionalnej Konferencji dotyczącej połowów na małą skałę na morzu Śródziemnym i Czarnym, zorganizowanej przez Generalną Komisję Rybołówstwa Morza Śródziemnego (GFCM) w partnerstwie z FAO i rządem algierskim (http://www.fao.org/gfcm/meetings/ssfconference2016/en/ ). GFCM jest regionalną organizacją ds. rybołówstwa (RFMO) odpowiedzialną za morze Śródziemne i Czarne.
Zapewnianie zrównoważonego rozwoju dla rybaków poławiających na małą skalę na morzu Śródziemnym i Błękitny Wzrost (Blue Growth) były głównymi tematami konferencji. Kolejny panel tematyczny objął kwestie współzarządzania, Chronione Obszary Morskie [MPAs], miejsce rybaków poławiających na małą skalę w łańcuchu wartości i wdrożenie Dobrowolnych Wytycznych na rzecz Zapewnienia Zrównoważonego Rozwoju Rybakom Poławiającym na Małą Skalę (Wytyczne SSF). Brian O’Riordan, Wicedyrektor LIFE, był uczestnikiem panelu na temat rybołówstwa na małą skałę. Omówił on „Implikacje zreformowanej WPRyb dla rybaków małoskalowych”. Marta Cavallé, koordynator śródziemnomorski LIFE, udzieliła wywiadu oficjalnemu zespołowi medialnemu.
Spotkanie było także okazją do działań networkingowych LIFE, obejmujących kluczowych decydentów, podmioty międzynarodowe i rybaków z Afryki Północnej, a mających na celu aranżowanie spotkań po to, aby rozwijać naszą strategię ds. morza Śródziemnego.
Spotkanie z rządem Zjednoczonego Królestwa
LIFE pozostaje w bliskich kontaktach z Amberem Ruddem, Sekretarzem Stanu ds. Energii i Zmiany Klimatycznej i członkiem parlamentu z okręgu Hastings i Rye na południowo-wschodnim wybrzeżu, co umożliwiło naszym brytyjskim organizacjom członkowskim; New Under Ten Fishermen’s Association (NUTFA, www.nutfa.org ), Coastal PO ( http://fish.coop/ ) spotkanie z ministrem ds. Żywności, Rolnictwa i Środowiska Morskiego, Georgem Eusticem.
W spotkaniu, które miało miejsce w czwartek, dziesiątego marca, uczestniczył Jerry Percy, Dyrektor Wykonawczy LIFE. Poruszono serię tematów obejmujących ostatnią nieprzychylną decyzję rządu Wielkiej Brytanii w sprawie ograniczenia wydawania licencji rybackich dla jednostek dziesięciometrowych i krótszych, które złowiły do 350 kg kwoty danego gatunku podczas okresu odniesieniowego, celem zwalczania ukryte możliwości w sektorze. Omówiono także także plany w zakresie zarządzania stadami labraksa w odniesieniu do zakresu kwot uzupełniających wprowadzonych przez ministra ds. Rybołówstwa, co było wynikiem działań NUTFA, oraz przepisy dotyczące składu połowu dla floty przybrzeżnej.
Cały czas budzi nasze głębokie niezadowolenie kwestia ukrytych możliwości, poza tym jednak spotkanie miało wydźwięk pozytywny, bowiem minister zaoferował konkretne wsparcie dla Przybrzeżnych Organizacji Producenckich, co jest inicjatywą promowaną obecnie przez wszystkie organizacje, których dotyczyło spotkanie.
Poza wsparciem dla organizacji członkowskiej, spotkanie pomogło LIFE lepiej zrozumieć punkt widzenia administracji jednego z Państw Członkowskich w odniesieniu do tworzenia nadbrzeżnych Organizacji Producenckich. Ta inicjatywa może przynieść potencjalne korzyści dla innych organizacji członkowskich w Europie.
INNE WYDARZENIA W UE
WIEŚCI ORGANIZACJI CZŁONKOWSKICH
Asoar Armega, organizacja członkowska LIFE z Galicji ( http://asoararmega.es ), była członkiem platformy regionalnej, która wniosła o odrzucenie kontrowersyjnej ustawy o akwakulturze. Wynikiem protestu było wycofanie ustawy przez szefa rządu Galicji „do czasu, gdy uzyska ona poparcie sektorowe”!
W grudniu zeszłego roku władze galisyjskie przygotowały wniosek ustawy o akwakulturze, aby przekształcić tradycyjny sektor zbierania skorupiaków w nowoczesny sektor akwakultury i sprywatyzować przybrzeżne obszary udzielając 20-letnich koncesji na akwakulturę przemysłową! Po miesiącach potyczek, protestów i strajków, w lutym bieżącego roku galicyjskiej wspólnocie udało się przekonać władze, aby wycofały wniosek ustawy, który mógłby spowodować zniszczenie tradycyjnego sposobu życia lokalnych wspólnot rybackich. (http://www.efeagro.com/noticia/galicia-anula-su-proyecto-de-ley-para-la-acuicultura/). Dzięki pracy i zaangażowaniu wspólnoty lokalnej, w marcu, władze Galicji zdecydowały o przekierowaniu inwestycji o łącznej wartości 18 milionów euro na rzecz rybactwa tradycyjnego i sektora zbioru skorupiaków.
Pierwszego marca LIFE wzięło udział w dorocznym Zgromadzeniu Ogólnym Francuskiej Platformy na rzecz Rybactwa Tradycyjnego (PPPAF – Plateforme de la Petite Pêche Artisanale Française) w Paryżu w Akwarium Porte Dorée. Kongres był okazją do przeglądu działań dot. labraksa podjętych pod koniec zeszłego roku. Pozwoliły one francuskim, brytyjskimi holenderskim rybakom poławiającym na małą skale osiągnąć całą serię korzyści płynących z grudniowego posiedzenia Rady ministrów. W szczególności:
Biorąc pod uwagę pozytywne wyniki współpracy, obie organizacje będą kontynuowały wspólne prace w ramach kwestii dotyczących rozwiązań politycznych i inicjatyw komunikacyjnych w roku bieżącym.
Gwen Pennarun, Dyrektor LIFE z Francji i Przewodniczący Stowarzyszenia Statków Połowowych z Bretanii, był członkiem jury w konkursie Oliviera Roelingera nt. ochrony zasobów morskich, zorganizowanego przez SeaWeb Europe 23-go marca. Studenci hotelarstwa z Austrii, Belgii, Francji, Niemiec, Irlandii, Luksemburga, Holandii, Wielkiej Brytanii i Szwajcarii przedstawili w Dinard, we Francji autorskie przepisy z ryb ze zrównoważonych źródeł. Konkurs zwiększa świadomość szefów kuchni na temat ciągłego wyniszczania zasobów morskich – młode pokolenie kucharzy będzie musiało odegrać ważną rolę chroniąc zasoby i promując zrównoważone połowy, a czasem mniej znane gatunki ( http://www.seaweb-europe.org/IMG/pdf/gb_2016_web.pdf ).
WITAMY NA POKŁADZIE!
Poza członkami, którzy dołączyli na początku 2016 roku, Pescartes (HISZPANIA), FSK (DANIA), Rybacy z Freest (NIEMCY), IIMRO (IRLANDIA), Rybacy z Pantelleria (WLOCHY), NetVISwerk (HOLANDIA), w bieżącym miesiącu następujące organizacje stały się formalnie członkami LIFE:
SCFF jest krajowym stowarzyszeniem handlowym zrzeszającym rybaków poławiających na przynętę. Ten tradycyjny i zrównoważony sposób przybrzeżnych połowów skorupiaków jest niezwykle ważny dla wspólnot żyjących na wybrzeżu Szkocji. LIFE wita 1200 członków SCFF i liczy na owocną współpracę w przyszłości!
Reprezentująca rybaków poławiających na małą skalę z regionu Langwedocji Roussillon, organizacja SPMLR jest silnym i niezależnym związkiem zawodowym współpracującym z całą serią instytucji i organizacji barażowych. Zarządza ona projektem etykietowania Golion (www.golion.fr), co pozwala na informowanie społeczeństwa o tym, jak ważną rolę odgrywają rybacy tradycyjni, a także na popularyzowanie ich wspaniałych, lokalnych i świeżych produktów. LIFE z przyjemnością wita 150 członków SPMLR, rybaków tradycyjnych, których ciężka praca powinna zostać doceniona na poziomie UE.
Marcowy Biuletyn Informacyjny jest krótkim przeglądem naszych działań zewnętrznych. Ponadto, personel LIFE w Wielkiej Brytanii i Hiszpanii na bieżąco odpowiada na wiele zapytań związanych z naszym sektorem i nieprzerwanie opracowuje i informuje na temat rozwiązań politycznych na rzecz rybaków i organizacji rybackich poławiających na małą skalę i o niskim wpływie środowiskowym.
Także nasi Dyrektorzy Regionalni, aktywni rybacy niskoskalowi promują wartości i korzyści płynące z rybołówstwa przybrzeżnego.
Aby dowiedzieć się więcej na temat konkretnego wydarzenia, projektu, czy inicjatywy, wyślij maila na adres: communications@lifeplatform.eu
PRINCIPALES EVENTOS DEL MES
Reunión con la DG Mare en temas del Báltico
El 4 de marzo, LIFE organizó una reunión con la Dirección General de Asuntos Marítimos y Pesca de la Comisión Europea (DG MARE), para discutir los temas que afectan a los pescadores de pequeña escala en el oeste del Mar Báltico. La reunión contó con la participación del personal de LIFE de la oficina de Bruselas, Wolfgang Albrecht (Director de LIFE, Alemania), Katarzyna Wysocka (Director de LIFE, Polonia), David Lange y Hanne Lyng Winter (en representación de FSK – Dinamarca, un miembro de LIFE). La reunión fue organizada por la DG Mare, con Bernard Friess, Jefe de la Dirección C (Atlántico), Jefe de la Dirección E (Mar Báltico) y su personal.
Los principales temas de discusión incluyeron el estado de los stocks, el cierre de la pesquería de bacalao, la selectividad y la captura incidental en la pesquería de arrastre, excepciones dadas a la pesca industrial, el trato justo para los pescadores de pequeña escala, y la participación de la pesca de pequeña escala en los Consejos Consultivos Regionales. La reunión fue muy positiva, y Bernhard Friess sugirió reuniones más frecuentes con LIFE y sus miembros para intercambiar sobre temas de su interés.
La Conferencia Regional de la CGPM sobre “Construir un futuro para la pesca sostenible de pequeña escala en el Mar Mediterráneo y el Mar Negro”
Miembros del equipo de LIFE participaron en la Conferencia Regional sobre la pesca a pequeña escala en el Mar Mediterráneo y el Mar Negro, organizada por la Comisión General de Pesca del Mediterráneo (CGPM), en colaboración con la FAO y el Gobierno de Argelia (http://www.fao.org/gfcm/meetings/ssfconference2016/en/ ). La CGPM es la Organización Regional de Ordenación Pesquera (OROP) responsable de los mares Mediterráneo y Negro.
Asegurar un futuro sostenible para la pesca a pequeña escala en el Mediterráneo en el contexto del crecimiento azul fue uno de los temas principales de la reunión. Otros paneles temáticos incluyeron la cogestión, las Áreas Marinas Protegidas [AMP], el papel de los pescadores de pequeña escala en la cadena de valor, y la aplicación de las Directrices voluntarias para Garantizar la pesca de pequeña escala (Directrices SSF). Brian O’Riordan, Director Adjunto de LIFE, fue ponente en el panel relativo a la pesca a pequeña escala, e hizo una presentación sobre “las implicaciones de la reformada PPC para los pescadores de pequeña escala” y Marta Cavallé, Coordinadora de LIFE en el Mediterráneo fue entrevistada por el equipo oficial de comunicación del evento.
La reunión también dio a LIFE la oportunidad de establecer contactos con algunos políticos, actores internacionales involucrados, pescadores del norte de África y para organizar una serie de reuniones para impulsar su estrategia Mediterránea.
Reunión con el gobierno de Reino Unido
LIFE recientemente trabajó en estrecha colaboración con Amber Rudd, Secretario de Estado de Energía y Cambio Climático y miembro del parlamento para Hastings y Rye en la costa sureste de Inglaterra para facilitar un encuentro entre una de nuestras organizaciones miembros del Reino Unido, la Asociación New Under Ten Fishermen’s Association (NUTFA, www.nutfa.org), la Organización de Productores Costera (http://fish.coop/) y el Ministro de Estado de Alimentación, Agricultura y Medio Ambi
ente, George Eustice MP.
La reunión, que tuvo lugar el jueves día 10, contó con la presencia de Jerry Percy, Director Ejecutivo de LIFE, y se cubrieron una serie de temas, incluyendo la no deseada reciente decisión del Gobierno del Reino Unido de imponer un límite a las licencias de pesca a los buques menores de 10 metros que capturaron menos de 350 kg de especies sometidas a cuota durante el período de referencia, para hacer frente a la capacidad latente percibida dentro de este sector, la futura gestión de la lubina con respecto a los efectos de los controles adicionales implementada recientemente, el alcance y la magnitud de los incrementos de cuota proporcionados por el Ministro de Pesca como consecuencia de los alegatos de NUTFA y el uso innecesario de las reglas de composición de las capturas de la flota de bajura.
Sin dejar de estar profundamente descontentos con respecto a la cuestión de la capacidad latente, la reunión fue por otro lado más positiva y el Ministro evidenció un apoyo específico a la iniciativa de la Organización de Productores Costera, actualmente impulsada por todas las organizaciones interesadas en la reunión.
Además de proporcionar apoyo a una organización miembro, la presencia de LIFE en la reunión también nos ha ayudado a entender más claramente la visión de una administración de un Estado Miembro en relación a la formación de la Organización de Productores
Costera. Esta iniciativa es potencialmente beneficiosa para otras organizaciones miembros en toda Europa.
OTROS EVENTOS EN TODA EUROPA
NOTICIAS DE NUESTROS MIEMBROS
Asoar-Armega, una organización miembro de LIFE de Galicia, España (http://asoararmega.es), fue parte de una plataforma regional que exigía el rechazo de un controvertido proyecto de ley de acuicultura. Como resultado de sus protestas, el proyecto de ley fue retirado por el presidente de Galicia, ¡”hasta que se cuente con el respaldo del sector”!
En diciembre del año pasado las autoridades gallegas redactaron un proyecto de ley de la acuicultura diseñado para transformar el sector tradicional marisquero en un sector de la acuicultura moderna, y la privatización de las zonas costeras mediante el otorgamiento de concesiones a 20 años para la acuicultura industrial! Después de varios meses de batalla, protestas y huelgas, en febrero de este año la comunidad gallega tuvo éxito en convencer a las autoridades en retirar el proyecto de ley, que habría destruido los medios de vida tradicionales de las comunidades pesqueras locales. (Http://www.efeagro.com/noticia/galicia-anula-su-proyecto-de-ley-para-la-acuicultura/). Gracias a la labor y el compromiso de la comunidad local, en marzo, las autoridades gallegas decidieron reorientar las inversiones por un total de 18 millones de euros a los sectores de la pesca artesanal y del marisqueo.
LIFE participó en el Congreso Anual de la Plataforma Francesa de la Pesca Artesanal (PPAF – Plateforme de la Petite Pêche Artisanale Française), celebrada el 1 de marzo en París en el acuario de la Porte Dorée. El Congreso fue una ocasión para examinar el importante trabajo realizado sobre la lubina a finales del año pasado que permitió a los pescadores artesanales de Francia, el Reino Unido y los Países Bajos obtener una serie de beneficios acordados en la reunión del Consejo de Ministros de diciembre. En particular:
Teniendo en cuenta el resultado positivo de la colaboración, las dos organizaciones continuarán trabajando juntas durante el año en una serie de iniciativas políticas y de comunicación.
Gwen Pennarun, Director de LIFE en Francia y Presidente de la Asociación de Palangreros de Cabo Bretaña, participó como miembro del jurado en el concurso de Roelinger Olivier para la preservación de los recursos marinos, organizado por SeaWeb Europa el 23 de marzo. Estudiantes de hostelería de Austria, Bélgica, Francia, Alemania, Irlanda, Luxemburgo, Países Bajos, Reino Unido y Suiza compitieron en Dinard, Francia, presentando sus propias recetas con pescado de fuentes sostenibles. El concurso alienta la sensibilidad entre los jóvenes chefs sobre el agotamiento continuo de los recursos marinos – la próxima generación de chefs tienen un papel vital que desempeñar en la preservación de los recursos mediante la promoción de las especies sostenibles, a menudo menos conocidas. (Http://www.seaweb-europe.org/IMG/pdf/gb_2016_web.pdf)
¡BIENVENIDOS A BORDO!
Además de los miembros que se unieron desde el comienzo de 2016 (Pescartes (ESPAÑA), FSK (Dinamarca), pescadores de Freest (ALEMANIA), IIMRO (Irlanda), Pescadores de Pantelleria (ITALIA), NetVISwerk (PAÍSES BAJOS), las siguientes organizaciones se convirtieron oficialmente en parte de LIFE este mes:
SCFF es la asociación comercial nacional de la pesca con nasas. Esta forma tradicional y sostenible de la pesca costera de crustáceos es vital para las comunidades que viven alrededor de la costa de Escocia. ¡LIFE recibe a sus 1200 miembros y está a la espera de iniciar una cooperación fructífera!
du Languedoc Roussillon (SPMLR). (FRANCIA)
En representación a los pescadores de bajo impacto y de pequeña escala de la región de Languedoc Roussillon, SPMLR es un sindicato fuerte e independiente que trabaja en cooperación con una serie de instituciones y organizaciones profesionales. Gestiona con éxito el proyecto de etiquetado Golion (www.golion.fr), que permite informar al público sobre la importancia de la pesca artesanal y sus productos locales y frescos. LIFE se complace en dar la bienvenida a sus 150 miembros, todos ellos pescadores artesanales comprometidos, que merecen ser reconocidos y que se visibilice su duro trabajo a nivel de la UE.
Este boletín es una sencilla “foto instantánea” de nuestras actividades externas del mes de marzo. Además, el personal de LIFE en el Reino Unido, Bruselas y España responde a una amplia gama de consultas relacionadas con nuestro sector y continuamente desarrolla y promulga políticas relacionadas con la pesca de pequeña escala y de bajo impacto. Nuestros directores regionales y todos los pescadores de pequeña escala también trabajan promoviendo los valores y beneficios de la pesca costera.
¿Le gustaría recibir información adicional acerca de un evento, proyecto o iniciativa específica? No dude en contactar con nosotros en communications@lifeplatform.eu
Incontro con DG Mare sulle problematiche del Mar Baltico
Il 4 Marzo, LIFE ha organizzato un incontro con la Direzione Generale degli Affari Marittimi e della Pesca (DG Mare) per discutere delle questioni che riguardano i pescatori artigianali del Mar Baltico Occidentale. All’incontro hanno partecipato il personale dell’Ufficio di Bruxelles di LIFE, Wolfgang Albrecht (Direttore di LIFE in Germania), Katarzyna Wysocka (Direttrice di LIFE in Polonia), David Lange e Hanne Lyng Winter (in rappresentanza di FSK – membro di LIFE in Danimarca). La riunione si è svolta presso la sede di DG MARE, alla presenza di Bernard Friess, Responsabile del Direttorato C (Atlantico) e rappresentante del Direttorato E (Mar Baltico) e dei suoi collaboratori.
Le questioni discusse hanno riguardato lo stato degli stock ittici, il fermo del merluzzo, la selettività ed i rigetti della pesca a strascico, le deroghe per la pesca industriale, un trattamento più equo per I pescatori artigianali, e la partecipazione dei pescatori artigianali nei Consigli Consultivi. L’incontro è stato molto positivo, e Bernhard Friess ha auspicato incontri puntuali con LIFE ed i suoi membri per scambi ed aggiornamenti sulle questioni più rilevanti.
La Conferenza Regionale organizzata dalla Commissione Generale per la Pesca del Mediterraneo (Cgpm) per la “Costruzione di un futuro sostenibile per la pesca nel Mediterraneo e nel Mar Nero”
Il personale di LIFE ha partecipato alla Conferenza Generale sulla Pesca Artigianale nel Mediterraneo e nel Mar Nero organizzata dalla Commissione Generale per la Pesca del Mediterraneao (Cgpm) in partenariato con la FAO e con il governo algerino (http://www.fao.org/gfcm/meetings/ssfconference2016/en/ ). La CGPM è l’Organizzazione Regionale per la Gestione della Pesca (ORGP) responsabile per il Mediterraneo ed il Mar Nero.
La tematica principale dell’evento è stata lo sviluppo di un futuro sostenibile per la pesca artigianale nel Mediterraneo nel quadro della Crescita Blu. Altre sessioni tematiche si sono concentrate sulla co-gestione, le Aree Marine Protette, il ruolo dei pescatori artigianali nella filiera e l’applicazione delle Linee guida volontarie per la Protezione della pesca su piccola scala sostenibile nel contesto della sicurezza alimentare e riduzione della povertà (VG SSF). Brian O’Riordan, Vice Direttore di LIFE, si è espresso in qualità di oratore nel panel sulla pesca artigianale con una presentazione sulle “Conseguenze della riforma della PCP per i pescatori artiginali” e Marta Cavallé, Coordinatrice di LIFE per il Mediterraneo, è stata intervistata dai responsabili media dell’evento.
L’incontro ha anche dato a LIFE l’opportunità di stabilire contatti con rappresentanti politici, parti interessate a livello internazionale, pescatori del Nord Africa e di fissare una serie di appuntamenti per rafforzare le sua strategia nel Mediterraneo.
Incontro con il Governo della Gran Bretagna
Recentemente LIFE ha lavorato in stretta collaborazione con Amber Rudd, Segretario di Stato per l’Energia ed i Cambiamenti Climatici e Membro del Parlamento per le località di Hastings e Rye on England’s, sulla costa sud est della Gran Bretagna, al fine di fissare un incontro tra uno dei membri di LIFE, la New Under Ten Fishermen’s Association (NUTFA, www.nutfa.org ), l’Organizzazione di Produttori Costieri The Coastal PO ( http://fish.coop/ ) ed il Ministro per l’Alimentazione, l’Agricoltura e l’Ambiente Marino, l’On. George Eustice.
Alle riunione, che si è tenuta Giovedi 10, ha partecipato il Direttore Esecutivo di LIFE Jeremy Percy. Sono stati trattati numerosi temi, inclusa l’impopolare decisione del governo inglese di imporre una limitazione alle licenze di pesca delle barche di meno di 10 metri che hanno catturato meno di 350kg di pesce sotto quota in un dato periodo di riferimento (in quanto tale mancanza è stata percepita come una mancanza di capacità del settore), la futura gestione della spigola alla luce dei controlli aggiuntivi applicati recentemente, l’aumento delle quote concesso dal Ministero della Pesca a seguito dell’azione di NUTFA ed infine le inutili regole sulla composizione del pescato per la flotta costiera.
Al di là del malcontento in merito alla questione sulla mancanza di capacità, l’incontro è stato piuttosto positive ed il Ministro ha espresso tutto il suo sostegno per l’iniziativa dell’Organizzazione di Produttori Costieri che al momento è portata avanti e supportata anche dalle altre organizzazioni che hanno partecipato all’incontro.
La presenza di LIFE all’incontro, oltre a fornire supporto ad uno dei membri, ha permesso al personale di capire meglio il punto di vista di un’amministrazione governativa in merito alla creazione di un’Organizzazione di Produttori Cositieri, iniziativa potenzialmente utile anche per altri membri di LIFE in Europa.
Asoar Armega ( http://asoararmega.es ), membro di LIFE in Galizia, in Spagna, ha partecipato ad un movimento regionale per chiedere di bloccare una proposta di legge molto discutibile sull’acquacoltura. A seguito di tale movimento e protesta, il progetto è stato ritirato dal Presidente della regione, per lo meno finché “non avrà l’approvazione di tutti i rappresentanti del settore” !
Infatti, a Dicembre dell’anno scorso le autorità della Galizia hanno redatto questa proposta di legge volta a trasformare il tradizionale settore di raccolta dei molluschi a favore di moderni impianti di acquacoltura, e di privatizzare la zona costiera tramite concessioni per tali impianti su un periodo di 20 anni! Dopo numerosi mesi di proteste e manifestazioni, la comunità della Galizia è riuscire a convincere le autorità a ritirare la proposta di legge, che avrebbe distrutto il lavoro della comunità di pesca locali (http://www.efeagro.com/noticia/galicia-anula-su-proyecto-de-ley-para-la-acuicultura/).
Grazie all’azione ed all’impegno della comunità locale, nel mese di Marzo le autorità hanno deciso di indirizzare gli investimenti, per un totale di 18 milioni di euro, alla pesca artigianale ed al settore della raccolta.
LIFE ha partecipato all’Assemblea Generale della Piattaforma per la Pesca Artigianale francese (PPPAF – Plateforme de la Petite Pêche Artisanale Française ) che si è svolta il 1° marzo a Parigi presso l’Acquario della Porta Dorata. L’Assemblea è stata l’occasione di ridiscutere l’importante lavoro svolto dalle due organizzazioni sulla spigola alla fine dell’anno scorso, che ha permesso ai pescatori artigianali di Francia, Gran Bretagna e Olanda di ottenere una serie di benefici nel quadro dell’incontro del Consiglio dei Ministri dell’Unione Europea di Dicembre. In particolare:
Visti i risultati estremamente positivi della collaborazione, le due organizzazioni continueranno a lavorare insieme nei mesi futuri su una serie di iniziative politiche e di comunicazione.
Gwen Pennarun, Direttore di LIFE in Francia e Presidente dell’Associazione dei Pescatori con Lenze a Canna della Punta di Bretagna, ha partecipato in qualità di giurato al Premio Olivier Roelinger per la Preservazione delle Risorse Marine, organizzato da SeaWeb Europe il 23 Marzo. Studenti del settore alberghiero provenienti da Austria, Belgio, Francia, Germania, Irlanda, Lussemburgo, Oland, Gran Bretagna e Svizzera si sono sfidati a Dinard, in Francia, presentando numerose ricette a base di prodotti di pesce sostenibili. La gara ha sensibilizzato i giovani sull’importanza della protezione delle risorse marine, in quanto la nuova generazione di chef ha un ruolo di rilievo nella difesa del pesce sostenibile e del pesce povero ( http://www.seaweb-europe.org/IMG/pdf/gb_2016_web.pdf ) .
BENVENUTI A BORDO!
Oltre ai membri che sono entrati a far parte della piattaforma all’inizio del 2016: Pescartes (SPAGNA), FSK (DANIMARCA), Pescatori di Freest (GERMANIA), IIMRO (IRLANDA), Associazione dei Pescatori di Pantelleria (ITALIA) e NetVISwerk (OLANDA), le organizzazioni seguenti sono entrate a far parte di LIFE nel mese di Marzo:
SCFF è il sindacato nazionale dei pescatori con nasse, forma di pesca tradizionale e sostenibile che ha un’importanza vitale per la comunità costiere della Scozia. LIFE da il benvenuto ai suoi 1200 membri e auspica una proficua collaborazione!
SPMLR è una sindacato forte ed indipendente che rappresenta i pescatori artigianali della regione Languedoc Roussillon e che collabora con numerose instituzioni e organizzazioni professionali. Gestisce con successo il progetto Golion (www.golion.fr), che permette di informare i consumatori sull’importanza della pesca artigianale e dei prodotti freschi locali. LIFE è lieta di dare il benvenuto ai suoi 150 membri, tutti pescatori impegnati nella sostenibilità che meritano di vedere il loro duro lavoro riconosciuto a livello europeo.
Questa newsletter di Marzo è solo una selezione delle attività esterne di LIFE. Oltre a queste ultime, il personale di LIFE in Gran Bretagna, Belgio e Spagna lavora su numerose pratiche del settore e sviluppa continuamente politiche e attività a favore di una pesca artiginale sostenibile.
I nostri Direttori Regionali, tutti pescatori artigianali, lavorano anch’essi ogni giorno per promuovere I valori ed i benefici della pesca costiera.
Desiderate informazioni aggiuntive su eventi specifici, progetti o iniziative? Non esistate a contattarci a communications@lifeplatform.eu
DIE WICHTIGSTEN EREIGNISSE DES MONATS
Treffen mit DG Mare zur Lage in der Ostsee
Am 4. März organisierte LIFE ein Treffen mit der Generaldirektion für maritime Angelegenheiten und Fischerei der Europäischen Kommission (DG Mare), um Anliegen und Probleme der kleinen Fischereibetriebe in der westlichen Ostsee zu besprechen. An der Besprechung haben Mitarbeiter des LIFE Büros in Brüssel, Wolfgang Albrecht (LIFE Vorstandsmitglied, Deutschland), Katarzyna Wysocka (LIFE Vorstandsmitglied, Polen), David Lange und Hanne Lyng Winter (als Vertreter und Vertreterin von FSK – Dänemark, ein Mitglied von LIFE) teilgenommen. Das Meeting wurde vom DG Mare ausgerichtet, für das Bernhard Friess, Leiter des Direktorats C (Atlantik) und ausführender Leiter des Direktorats E (Ostsee) sowie dessen Mitarbeiter vor Ort waren.
Diskutiert wurden die Fischbestände, die Schließung der Dorschfischerei, Selektivität und Beifang in der Schleppnetzfischerei, Ausnahmen für die industrielle Fischerei, die faire Behandlung von kleinen Fischereibetrieben sowie die Teilnahme von nachhaltigen, kleinen Fischereibetrieben an Beiräten. Insgesamt war das Treffen sehr produktiv, Bernhard Friess schlug vor, regelmäßige Besprechungen mit LIFE und dessen Mitgliedern abzuhalten um einen Austausch zu wichtigen Anliegen und Problembereichen zu etablieren.
Die GFCM Regionalkonferenz „Die Zukunft für nachhaltige, kleine Fischereibetriebe in der Mittel- und Schwarzmeerregion gestalten”
LIFE Mitarbeiter nahmen an der Regionalkonferenz über kleine Fischereibetriebe in der Mittel- und Schwarzmeerregion teil, die von der General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM “Allgemeine Kommission für Fischerei im Mittelmeer”) in Kooperation mit der FAO und der algerischen Regierung organisiert wurde (http://www.fao.org/gfcm/meetings/ssfconference2016/en/ ). GFCM ist die regionale Organisation für Fischereimanagement („Regional Fisheries Management Organization“ (RFMO)), die für das Mittelmeer und das Schwarze Meer zuständig ist.
Hauptthema war die Sicherung einer nachhaltigen Zukunft für kleine Fischereibetriebe im Mittelmeer, im Kontext der Strategie “Blaues Wachstum”. Andere Themen waren die Mitbestimmung, Meeresschutzgebiete („Marine Protected Areas“ – MPAs), die Rolle kleiner Fischereibetriebe in der Wertschöpfungskette sowie die Implementierung der freiwilligen Richtlinien zur Sicherstellung kleiner Fischereibetriebe (Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF Guidelines)). Brian O’Riordan, LIFEs Geschäftsführer, hielt einen Vortrag zu den Auswirkungen der Reformen der Gemeinsamen Fischereipolitik auf nachhaltige, kleine Fischereibetriebe und Marta Cavallé, LIFEs Mittelmeerkoordinatorin wurde vom offiziellen Medienteam des Events interviewt.
Die Konferenz ermöglichte LIFE außerdem mit wichtigen Entscheidungsträgern, internationalen Stakeholdern und Fischern aus Nordafrika in Kontakt zu treten. LIFE konnte eine Reihe von Treffen vereinbaren, um so die Mittelmeerstrategie voranzutreiben.
Treffen mit der Regierung des Vereinigten Königreichs
LIFE hat in letzter Zeit eng mit Amber Rudd, Staatssekretärin für Energie und Klimawandel sowie Parlamentsabgeordnete für Hastings und Rye an der englischen Südostküste, zusammengearbeitet um ein Treffen zwischen einer unserer Mitgliederorganisationen im Vereinigten Königreich, New Under Ten Fishermen’s Association (NUTFA, www.nutfa.org ), der Erzeugerorganisation „Coastal PO“ ( http://fish.coop/ ) und dem Minister für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Meeresumwelt, George Eustice (Parlamentsabgeordneter) zu ermöglichen.
Das Treffen fand am 10. März statt, Jerry Percy, LIFEs Geschäftsführer, nahm daran teil.
Besprochen wurde unter anderem die heikle Entscheidung der Regierung des Vereinigten Königreichs die Fanglizenzen für Fahrzeuge bis zu zehn Meter, die während einem bestimmten Zeitraum weniger als 350 kg an Quoten unterliegenden Arten gefangen haben, zu deckeln. Außerdem wurden folgende Themen diskutiert: Die ungenutzten Kapazitäten im Sektor; der zukünftige Umgang mit Barsch im Hinblick auf die Auswirkungen der zuletzt eingeführten zusätzlichen Kontrollen; das Ausmaß der Quotenerhöhung, die das Fischereiministerium aufgrund der von NUTFA ergriffenen Maßnahmen gewährte; sowie die überflüssige Anwendung von Vorschriften über die Zusammensetzung der Fänge auf Küstenflotten.
Trotz der unbefriedigenden Situation in Bezug auf das Problem der ungenutzten Kapazitäten, war das Meeting insgesamt ein Erfolg. Der Minister bekundete besondere Unterstützung für die Initiative der Küstenerzeugerorganisation, die aktuell von allen betroffenen Organisationen des Meetings befürwortet wird.
LIFEs Teilnahme an diesem Meeting diente nicht nur der Unterstützung eines Mitglieds, sondern half auch den Standpunkt einer nationalen Verwaltung im Hinblick auf die Gründung einer Küstenerzeugerorganisation, zu verstehen. Diese Initiative könnte auch für andere Mitglieder in Europa nützlich sein.
ANDERE EVENTS AUF EU-EBENE
NEUIGKEITEN VON UNSEREN MITGLIEDERN
Asoar Armega, LIFE Mitglied aus Galizien ( http://asoararmega.es ), war Teil einer regionalen Plattform, die sich gegen das in der Öffentlichkeit kontrovers diskutierte Aquakulturengesetz ausgesprochen hatte. Aufgrund der anhaltenden Proteste, hat der galizische Präsident den Gesetzesvorschlag letztendlich zurückgezogen „bis er die Unterstützung des Sektors hat“.
Im Dezember letzten Jahres legten die galizischen Behörden einen Gesetzesentwurf vor, der die traditionelle Schalentierfischerei in einen Aquakultursektor umwandeln sollte. Unter anderem sollten auch Küstengebiete privatisiert werden, indem industrielle Aquakulturlizenzen über einen Zeitraum von 20 Jahren vergeben werden sollten! Nach monatelang andauernden Streiks und Protesten, gelang es der galizischen Gemeinschaft im Februar dieses Jahres die Behörden zu überzeugen, den Gesetzesentwurf, der die traditionelle Fischerei gefährdete, zurückzuziehen (http://www.efeagro.com/noticia/galicia-anula-su-proyecto-de-ley-para-la-acuicultura/). Dank des unermüdlichen Einsatzes der lokalen Gemeinschaft, gelang es im März die galizischen Behörden zu überzeugen, 18 Millionen EUR in handwerkliche Fischerei und Schalentierfischerei zu investieren.
LIFE nahm am jährlichen Kongress der französischen Plattform für handwerkliche Fischerei (PPPAF – Plateforme de la Petite Pêche Artisanale Française ), der am 1. März im Aquarium Porte Dorée in Paris stattfand, teil. Der Kongress war eine gute Gelegenheit, die erfolgreiche Zusammenarbeit beim Wolfsbarsch zu besprechen. Kleine Fischereibetriebe aus Frankreich, dem Vereinigten Königreich und den Niederlanden profitieren von einigen Änderungen, die der Ministerrat im Dezember beschlossen hat:
Aufgrund der bisher erfolgreichen Zusammenarbeit werden die beiden Organisationen auch in Zukunft bei Initiativen kooperieren.
Gwen Pennarun, LIFEs Vorstandsmitglied aus Frankreich und Vorsitzende der bretonischen Organisation für Leinenfischerei, war Jurymitglied beim Olivier Roelinger Wettbewerb für die Erhaltung der Meeresressourcen, der von SeaWeb Europe am 23. März in Dinard (Frankreich) ausgerichtet wurde. Auszubildende und Berufseinsteiger aus Belgien, Deutschland, Frankreich, Irland, Luxemburg, den Niederlanden, Österreich, aus der Schweiz und dem Vereinigten Königreich nahmen am Wettbewerb teil, indem sie ihre eigenen Rezepte präsentierten und dafür ausschließlich nachhaltig gefangenen Fisch verwendeten. Der Wettbewerb soll Nachwuchsköche auf die andauernde Ausbeutung der Meeresressourcen aufmerksam machen und sie überzeugen, sich für die Erhaltung der Meeresressourcen einzusetzen, indem sie nachhaltige und weniger bekannte Fischarten anbieten ( http://www.seaweb-europe.org/IMG/pdf/gb_2016_web.pdf ).
WILLKOMMEN AN BOARD
Seit Jahresbeginn 2016 sind Pescartes (SPANIEN), FSK (DÄNEMARK), Fischerei Freest (DEUTSCHLAND), IIMRO (Irland), Fischer von Pantelleria (ITALIEN), NetVISwerk (NIEDERLANDE) LIFE beigetreten. Im März wurden die folgenden Organisationen zu LIFE Mitgliedern:
SCFF ist die nationale Handelsorganisation für Reusenfischerei. Diese traditionelle und nachhaltige Form der Schalentierfischerei ist für die Gemeinden an der schottischen Küste besonders bedeutend. LIFE heißt die 1200 Mitglieder von SCFF willkommen und freut sich auf eine gute Zusammenarbeit.
SPMLR vertritt nachhaltige, kleine Fischereibetriebe aus Languedoc Roussillon. Der unabhängige Berufsverband kooperiert mit verschiedenen Institutionen und Verbänden. Außerdem verwaltet er das Golion Label (www.golion.fr), das die Öffentlichkeit über die Bedeutung der handwerklichen Fischerei und deren ausgezeichnete lokale und frische Produkte informiert. LIFE freut sich besonders die 150 Mitglieder von SPMLR, allesamt engagierte Fischer deren Arbeit nun auch auf EU- Ebene repräsentiert werden soll, willkommen zu heißen.
Dieser Newsletter zeigt nur einige unserer Tätigkeiten auf. LIFE Mitarbeiter im Vereinigten Königreich, Brüssel und Spanien beantworten außerdem Anfragen im Zusammenhang mit unserem Sektor und setzen sich für die Entwicklung politischer Maßnahmen, die nachhaltigen, kleinen Fischereibetrieben zugutekommen, ein.
Unsere regionalen Vorstandsmitglieder, die selbst als Fischer tätig sind, bemühen sich ebenso um die Förderung der handwerklichen Fischerei.
Sollten Sie mehr Informationen zu einem bestimmten Thema, einer Veranstaltung oder einem Projekt wünschen, zögern Sie nicht uns zu kontaktieren: communications@lifeplatform.eu